1. Chapter one: In recounting her journey through many educational
reforms, Diane Ravitch makes a number of provocative statements. Choose two,
quote them, and personally respond.
“Testing, I realized with dismay, had become a central preoccupation
in the schools and was not just a measure but an end in itself.”
I understand the importance of accountability and testing, but when it
is taken to an extreme like NCLB implemented, unintentional negative
consequences have emerged. For example, teachers spend weeks preparing their
students for these language arts and math basic skills tests, which do not
actually test the students knowledge, but more so their ability to take a test.
Then, based on those results, schools are either rewarded or penalized. We need
to rethink this system and start from an end result. What type of students do
we want our education system to produce? Are math and language arts the most
important subjects—the only ones that students should be held accountable for?
Testing has taken over our schools and it has left teachers feeling frustrated,
unable to attain unrealistic goals, and it is making our students dumber. Let’s
figure out another, more inclusive, and less intimidating way to hold our
schools accountable.
“We must make sure that our schools have a strong, coherent, explicit
curriculum that is grounded in the liberal arts and sciences, with plenty of
opportunity for children to engage in activities and projects that make
learning lively.”
I completely agree with Ravitch here. I believe that liberal arts and
science are just as important as math. I feel that during science class
students have the opportunity to interact with hands on materials and make
their learning more concrete and thus real. Making learning lively is an
incredibly important skill for teachers to learn. As a Kindergarten teacher, it
is one of the things that I love most about our curriculum. When I talk about
this with my friends, most of them reply, saying that they loved all of the
hands on learning that took place in Kindergarten and felt like it was
“downhill from there.” As teachers, it is our job to make the curriculum come
alive, whether that be through small group discussions, performance
assessments, or field trips outside. We have an obligation to engage our
learners and connect the material to their personal lives—I believe that in
those moments is when students really learn.
2. Chapter two: On page 16, Ravitch gives a brief definition of a
well-educated person. How would you characterize a well-educated person? What
should any well-educated person know in today’s world?
A well-educated person knows how to positively interact and
collaborate with others while respecting and listening to their ideas. A
well-educated person knows how to trouble shoot, problem solve, and use
resources around them to gain understandings and come to conclusions. A
well-educated person is well rounded in their subject knowledge and is a life
long learner.
In today’s world a well-educated person should know world history,
have an understanding of their own personal history, know the basic elements of
science, know how to problem solve using math, be able to read and write and
express themselves in a coherent and succinct manner, and appreciate and
understand music, art, and philosophy.
3. Thinking about the class discussion on the book, what
stands out for you? What would you have liked to say that you did not say?
Regarding the book so far, what stands out to me is how many
reforms and attempts to “fix” our education system have taken place and either
failed like NCLB, or have not gained enough momentum to be put into place. What
I take from these various reforms and ideas are that people deeply care about
the education of our children. What I also am starting to believe is that these
policymakers are rather disconnected from schools, how they function, and what
it means to receive a well-rounded education. The status of our schools,
because of NCLB, is appalling and puts such a sour taste in my mouth when it
comes to policymaking and accountability. I agree with Ravitch, that what we
need to be focusing on is rich curriculum based standards and finding another
way to hold our students accountable for information that they have learned in
ALL subject areas.
4. Choose one gap you listed from your subject area and
identify 3 resources: a website, an article, and a book that can help you fill
that gap. List these and discuss what you learned from one of these.
Within my subject area that I am exploring (garden-based
nutrition education in elementary schools), one gap that I have discovered in
my knowledge base is the current status of nutrition education in elementary
schools. I found a statistical analysis report, conducted by the federal
government, that details nutrition education in K-5 public elementary school
classrooms. This report will help me understand how many teachers have had
formal nutrition education training, what resources are available for teachers,
how many teachers teach lessons regarding nutrition education, and whether they
teach it as a separate subject or weave it into other content areas.
Another gap in my content area is how and where garden based
nutrition education fits into current content standards. I found a book,
published by the government (again), called A Child’s Garden Standards, which
links school gardens to California Education Standards for grades two through
six. I have learned that this guide bridges the distance between the garden
based experience and the standards by linking specific lessons to specific
standards in grades two through six.
Last, another gap in my content knowledge was the actual
process of planning, preparing, and caring for a school garden. I found two
websites that have assisted me in understanding the process. First, Michelle
Obama has a great garden checklist that can help a school get started in
finding the right spot. http://www.letsmove.gov/school-garden-checklist
Second, the University of Califronia Garden Web provides a more detailed
process of planning and preparing your own garden. http://ucanr.edu/sites/gardenweb/Vegetables/
5. Your annotations of resources are meant to be both
scholarly and brief. Discuss in detail why/how any two of these articles were
useful to your topic/question(s). Consider such things as listing specific
information you learned that you didn't know before; how this new learning
leads to other questions or sources; why this writer was convincing; whether
you would seek this writer out for other articles he/she has written, and
anything else you'd like to state in a blog that others can learn from and
read.
One article that was useful to my topic investigated whether a
garden-enhanced nutrition curriculum improved fourth grade school children’s
knowledge of nutrition and preference for some vegetables. Specifically, I
learned that the curriculum improved students’ preferences for several vegetables.
Students only exposed to the nutrition lessons increased preferences for
carrots and broccoli. However, students at the garden site also increased their
preferences for snow peas and zucchini. This shows that just being exposed to a
nutrition education curriculum can affect students’ preferences for vegetables.
Ann Cooper, head of nutrition for Berkeley Unified School District and
an outspoken activist for serving fresh and sustainable foods to students,
spoke at TED in December 2007. This primary source is incredibly useful in
regards to my topic because she outlines who is responsible for the unhealthy
school lunches provided to our students across the country and why it is so
important that we fix the problem and get it right. She launched the Great
American Salad Project (GRASP), which provides fresh salad bars in over 300
schools and also joined Jamie Oliver’s TheLunchBox.org, which gives school the
resources to transform their menus and provide healthy meals. Because Ann lives
in Berkeley, Ca, I am hoping to contact and possibly get her opinion on a
garden based nutrition curriculum.
Taylor Terhune
Hi Kaitlyn,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your statements about testing. NCLB had good intentions in terms of holding schools accountable, but its implementation was a disaster. I think it is important to be thoughtful of who we want our students to be and backwards plan from there. I think Common Core standards have made an effort in that regard and that the strands throughout the standards seek to create a more hands-on and meaningful set of standards.
It sounds like you are finding some cool resources. I can't wait to see how it shapes your project and what you can find out. I hope you can get in touch with Ann Cooper and I would suggest trying to get in touch with Alice Waters who is also and Bay Area resident and huge proponent of nutrition education. I'm not sure how realistic that would be, but it's another suggestion for an experiential source. Good luck!
Katie Rainey
Kaitlyn,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog and very much agreed with the comments you made regarding what you believe makes a well-educated person. I particularly loved when you said, "A well-educated person knows how to trouble shoot, problem solve, and use resources around them to gain understandings and come to conclusion". I feel that today many people who may be very "book smart" do not have the proper knowledge or education needed in order to find solutions to everyday problems, use the resources around them, and come to their own conclusions and understandings. It will be interesting to see with the implementation of the new Common Core standards if these critical thinking and life skills change this and better prepare students to solve the problems they will encounter throughout their academic and personal lives.
On another note, I think that your project is so interesting and think you have found some very interesting and useful resources. I am so looking forward to seeing if getting in touch with Ann Cooper works out for you and interested in what she would have to share with you!
-Alaina